Andrew James John Mackenzie
an historiography
Home
Blog
Photos
CV
Contact Me
January, 2012
February, 2012
April, 2012
June, 2012
July, 2012
August, 2012
September, 2012
October, 2012
November, 2012
December, 2012
January, 2013
February, 2013
March, 2013
April, 2013
May, 2013
June, 2013
July, 2013
August, 2013
September, 2013
October, 2013
November, 2013
December, 2013
January, 2014
February, 2014
March, 2014
April, 2014
May, 2014
June, 2014
July, 2014
August, 2014
September, 2014
October, 2014
November, 2014
December, 2014
January, 2015
February, 2015
April, 2015
May, 2015
June, 2015
July, 2015
August, 2015
September, 2015
October, 2015
November, 2015
December, 2015
January, 2016
February, 2016
April, 2016
May, 2016
June, 2016
July, 2016
August, 2016
September, 2016
October, 2016
November, 2016
December, 2016
January, 2017
March, 2017
June, 2017
What happened to the Sphinx’s Nose?


For an eternity it seems, historians and the general public have been fascinated with the Ancient Egyptians. Whether it be the fantastic, freestanding monuments to their dead monarchy, the mystic symbolism of hieroglyphic linguistics or the treasure troves unearthed from secret underground crypts, the Egyptians have occupied especial significance in archaeological and historical academic circles. One of the many secrets that still manage to fascinate both students and tourists to this day is the mystery of the missing Sphinx’s nose.

Many theories have materialized over the centuries as to how and why the nose detached. Certain contemporaries attested that troops in the employ of Napoleon shot it down with cannonballs during their North African campaign. Others attest that British troops, the Marnluks and others still could have been responsible.

 

The sketches drawn up by Frederic Louis Norden demonstrate, however, that the nose was nonexistent from as early as 1738, a full thirty years or so before Napoleon was born. Moreover, the histories of al-Maqrīzī written in the 15th century paint a different story as to how the nose came to be removed.

 

Examination of the face reveals that long rods or chisels were employed to remove the nose, hammering into the nose itself, down from the bridge and from underneath, in order for the perpetrator to pry the nose away.



Indeed, al-Maqrīzī reveals that the person responsible was an iconoclast named, Muhammad Sa'im al-Dahr, a Sufi Muslim from the khanqah of Sa'id al-Su'ada. The Arab historian contends that, upon learning of the ritualistic offerings being made to the Sphinx by local peasants to support the harvest, Sa'im al-Dahr flew into an outrage and became intent on vandalising the sculpture. His crime of desecrating the ‘talisman of the Nile’ was punishable by hanging.

 

Whether this account explains in full the mystery surrounding the missing nose has now been lost in the sands of time. It does, however, make for interesting imaginings.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

All copyrighted material used in this article or cited by this website is the property of their respective owners and ajjmackenzie.co.uk in no way accepts any responsibility for an infringement on one of the above.


<< Back Add New Comment
0 items total
Add New Comment
Name*
Subject*
Comment*
Please type the confirmation code you see on the image*
Reload image
HomeBlogPhotosCVContact Me